6 The word "Atheism"

DIMA SOKOL | 9:33 PM |

I shudder every time I hear about people being called "proponents" of atheism or "believers" in atheism. What sort of bullshit is that? There is only one reality and that reality is devoid of Gods, meaning and its dumb and futile. Its a dumb DNA molecule that evolved billions of years ago and has been reproducing since then in a deterministic, mechanical universe. That DNA molecule was designed by crude forces of unintelligent design and while I can't really explain how the Big Bang happened (in terms of how the quantum fluctuation led to the Big Bang and its subsequent inflation and how that process came to be)or why it happened or whether it will happen again after the heath death of the universe, it doesn't really matter because the fact of the matter is that the universe was just fine existing as it was before sentience came here and started probing it for deeper purposes. Its stupidity, futility and indifference are really just a result of crude forces (whether they are in effect when jump-starting the process of evolution or when jump-starting the universe) and of unintelligent, sloppy design and the advent of sentience on the face of it is of utmost cruelty and futility as the human race is doing nothing here, has no meaning for doing anything, is not rewarded for anything and its just wasting its time in indulging in meaningless needs/desires that never had to exist and are justified post-factum by that same sentience since its so god damn addicted to the attempts to satisfy that inherent deprivation of itself in an insentient, crude universe (the only value is ending the suffering and going back to non-existence).

I think the word "atheism" should either be changed or charged with a different context. We are not "believers in a theory" - we are telling everyone else how reality is according to science, logic and rationality. Everyone else (whether they are buddhists, hinduists, christians, muslims, jewish, new age thinkers, fake atheist positive thinkers, etc etc) are proponents of dogma and irrationality. So no, you're not allowed to call us "Them. these atheists who don't agree with us". We are the only ones who understand what reality is and don't lie to themselves about it while you are the ones who delude yourself into thinking and are entrapped by the need/desire mechanism, the optimistic thinking and the irrational postulation of invisible forces and realities to make yourselves feel better and preserve the hope that you go on in a different existence.

There is only one reality. There is only atheism and the subsequent adoption of Antinatalism/Efilism since its the only rational, logically coherent path.

I propose to remove the word "atheism" from the vocabulary as it is replete with too many negative connotations in relation to all the fabricated irrational stuff from the other camp.

Let's just leave it at "efilism" and let it denote both the only correct picture of reality and the subsequent actions that should be followed upon that realization (antinatalism).



On a related note, I made a response video to one of Garys` (inmendham) videos so I am putting them all here. 1st one is the original video, 2nd one is my response video, the 3rd one is his response video to mine (the response to me starts @ 11:55), the 4th one is my response to him and the 5th one is his second response to me (the response starts @ 11:07):








Stop recreating and disturbing the nothingness of the unborn! Its the ultimate act of criminality and insanity!


* Credit goes to Faustus from the blog "Pyrosophy" on my sidebar for the last pic as he found it first :)

6 comments:

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh-hdLKITZA&noredirect=1

    "The Stork Is the Bird of War"

    Great blog, Dimasok!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jules. I saw this video before and I showed it to my mom too. Its really awesome! That's the destructive nature of the plague of human existence on the face of the planet! While I am against all existence in general, humans are the MOST destructive ones and the ones that are completely in discord with the rest of nature.

      Delete
  2. Awesome blog post. The only thing I am quite not in agreement so far is about efilism, since I don´t exactly know where that word came from, or what exactly it means. But all the rest is spot on.

    Cheers!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Shadow. I only mentioned efilism since it originated from inmendham and it seems to encompass the complete picture of evolution in that its a dumb DNA molecule that evolved in a Godless universe ruled by crude forces of unintelligent design. I just couldn't find a better word to describe it all and since Gary coined it first, I used that instead. Whichever word we use instead, I hate people like us being described as "Atheists" as if there is any other alternative to that! There ISN'T! Its either you're an atheist and you're rational or you're something else and you're irrational.

      Delete
  3. How about naturalism? This encompasses both the rejection of anything supernatural, the acceptance of science as a valid method, and the rejection of free will.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank Francois. Never thought about that even though I heard the term used many times! I think this could definitely do as a replacement for atheism and when I hear the term it doesn't invoke any association with theism or any other irrational belief systems so it's definitely a good choice of a word!

      Delete